A clinical comparative study of four interocclusal recording materials
Mohammad Kinan Seirawan1, Sham Alobeissi2, Mazen Doumani3, Bilal D Mourshed4, Mohammad Yaman Seirawan5, Khaled Al-Hallak1, Eyad Alshaarani2
1 Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria; Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi College for Dentistry and Nursing, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Syria 2 Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria 3 Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi Collsege for Dentistry and Nursing, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 4 Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi College for Dentistry and Nursing, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics, and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University at Kiel, Kiel, Germany, Saudi Arabia 5 Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria
Correspondence Address:
Mazen Doumani, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi College for Dentistry and Nursing, Riyadh Saudi Arabia
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None DOI: 10.4103/INJO.INJO_23_19
|